Where the software is most likely to fail is with color negatives (which, unfortunately, is likely to be the most common storage medium). The LED lamps in these things are pretty consistent so the default profiles supplied by the manufacturer's work pretty well. We've been disappointed that none of them provide a way, out of the box, to build a scanner profile, although SilverFast and VueScan can do that if you don't mind an additional purchase (plus the IT8 targets).īut in a sense, we've missed the boat. And we've been suspicious of the dynamic range they can capture, particularly an issue with slides. We've been skeptical that this class of device can handle the demands of faded originals and difficult emulsions (like Kodachrome). It also includes our recommendation for reasonably digitizing your photo collection. Our V600 review, being the first for this class of device, includes a Short Course on Scanning. The scanning process is just too slow for that. It is least likely to be digitizing your entire lifetime of memories. So we always feel obliged to warn readers that, in practice, a flatbed scanner is most likely to be used to squeeze every bit you can out of an important image. While all three of these scanners are impressive little boxes delivering more value per dollar than we've ever seen in a flatbed, the process of scanning your film and print archives is no less arduous than it's ever been. But only the white box gave away the pre-production nature of this unit. Retail units had not started shipping when we wrapped up this review. We've been using a review unit for a few weeks now. And at just $50 more than the CanoScan 8800F, the upgrade won't make you wince. With 9600x9600 dpi optical resolution, you can just about paint your house with a 35mm slide.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |